egrepa
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
    • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • CA20104
    • PA4AGE
    • Actimentia
    • Whole
    • Active I
  • RESEARCH
    • young researchers
      • Congress on-line 2021 Young researcher award
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
    • Congress on-line 2021
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
  • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • Whole
    • Active I
    • Actimentia
  • RESEARCH
    • Young Researchers
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symosium 2015 – Abstract
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
egrepa
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
  • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • Whole
    • Active I
    • Actimentia
  • RESEARCH
    • Young Researchers
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symosium 2015 – Abstract
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
  • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • Whole
    • Active I
    • Actimentia
  • RESEARCH
    • Young Researchers
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symosium 2015 – Abstract
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
Relationship between a three-month physical conditioning “posture-balance-motricity and health education” (PBM-HE) program on postural and balance capacities of sedentary older adults: influence of initial motor profile
Home » EURAPA abstracts » Relationship between a three-month physical conditioning “posture-balance-motricity and health education” (PBM-HE) program on postural and balance capacities of sedentary older adults: influence of initial motor profile

Relationship between a three-month physical conditioning “posture-balance-motricity and health education” (PBM-HE) program on postural and balance capacities of sedentary older adults: influence of initial motor profile

December 31, 2018 9:16 am Comments Off on Relationship between a three-month physical conditioning “posture-balance-motricity and health education” (PBM-HE) program on postural and balance capacities of sedentary older adults: influence of initial motor profile morw31

Pierre Louis Bernard, Hubert Blain, Aurelie Gerazime, Olivier Maurelli, Jean Bousquet and régory Ninot

European Review of Aging and Physical Activity2018
published: 20 November 2018

Abstract

Background

The aims of this study were (i) to define the relationship between a physical reconditioning cycle using balance exercises and muscular-articular stress and the balance capabilities of sedentary older adults and (ii) to assess whether older adults with weaker equilibrium abilities have a significantly limited progression. Our sample consisted of 338 people (263 women, 75 men) with an age, weight and height of 74.4 years (+/− 8.6), 67 kg (+/− 13.6) and 161.4 cm (+/− 8) and with a body mass index of 25.6 (+/− 4.3). The functional evaluations consisted of individual motor profile tests, monopodal eyes open and eyes closed for 30 s, a Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and stabilometric measurements on hard ground with eyes open for a duration of 25.6 s. The physical repackaging protocol was based on the 12-week Posture-Balance-Motricity and Health Education (PBM-ES) method with two 90-min weekly group sessions.

Results

The evolution of the “posture” and “balance” variables was significantly associated with the equilibration capacities (p < 0.001). For unipedal stance with open eyes on the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively, the progressions were significant for the profiles of middle (OR: 4.78 and 2.42) and low levels (OR: 4.34 and 1.66). Eyes-closed progressions were non-significant for the low-level balance profiles. For the COP Surface and Length variables, compared to those with high levels of balance, respectively, the progressions were significant for the middle- (OR: 1.41 and 2.98) and low-level (OR: 2.91 and 3.28) profiles.

Conclusions

After a 3-month bi-weekly PBM-HE program, we observed that sedentary older adults with the lowest initial level of balance progressed significantly more than high-level individuals, but only for basic motor abilities. It turns out that even among the most deconditioned people and older adults, very significant progress can be made. This increase requires an individualized training content focused on initial mobilizable capacities.

Posted in: EURAPA abstracts
« Previous
Next »

About


View all posts by morw31

  • membership
  • contact
  • links
  • Main theme of previous months
  • Home
  • Active I
  • congresses
  • contact
  • EGREPA
  • membership
  • publications
  • Research Centers
  • Societies
  • Whole
  • young researchers
we will be happy to hear from you
All rights reserved to EGREPA©
Scroll to top
Skip to content
Open toolbar

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase Text
  • Decrease Text
  • Grayscale
  • High Contrast
  • Negative Contrast
  • Light Background
  • Links Underline
  • Readable Font
  • Reset