egrepa
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
    • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • CA20104
    • PA4AGE
    • Actimentia
    • Whole
    • Active I
  • RESEARCH
    • young researchers
      • Congress on-line 2021 Young researcher award
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
    • Congress on-line 2021
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
  • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • Whole
    • Active I
    • Actimentia
  • RESEARCH
    • Young Researchers
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symosium 2015 – Abstract
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
egrepa
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
  • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • Whole
    • Active I
    • Actimentia
  • RESEARCH
    • Young Researchers
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symosium 2015 – Abstract
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
  • Home
  • EGREPA
    • Constitution
    • Mission statement
  • EURAPA
    • EURAPA Journal
    • EURAPA Abstract
    • History – EURAPA
  • PROJECTS
    • Whole
    • Active I
    • Actimentia
  • RESEARCH
    • Young Researchers
      • The winner of Young Researcher Award
    • Research Centers
  • CONGRESSES & SYMPOSIUMS
    • wingate 2014
    • Symosium 2015 – Abstract
    • Symposium 2017
      • Symposium 2017 – Abstract
    • Conference Announcement 2018
    • Symposium 2019
Effects of two exercise protocols on postural balance of elderly women: a randomized controlled trial
Home » August main topic - balance » Effects of two exercise protocols on postural balance of elderly women: a randomized controlled trial

Effects of two exercise protocols on postural balance of elderly women: a randomized controlled trial

August 2, 2018 2:57 pm Comments Off on Effects of two exercise protocols on postural balance of elderly women: a randomized controlled trial morw31

Laiana Sepúlveda de Andrade Mesquita, Fabiana Texeira de Carvalho, Lara Sepúlveda de Andrade Freire, Osmar Pinto Neto and, Renato Amaro Zângaro

BMC Geriatrics Published: 2 June 2015

 

Abstract

Background

The aging process reduces both sensory capabilities and the capabilities of the motor systems responsible for postural control, resulting in a high number of falls among the elderly. Some therapeutic interventions can directly interrupt this process, including physical exercise. This study compares and examines the effects of two exercise protocols on the balance of elderly women.

Methods

Elderly women who participated in a local church project (n = 63) were randomly divided into three groups: the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group (PNFG), Pilates group (PG), and control group (CG). Of the 63 women, 58 completed the program. A training program involving 50-min sessions was performed in the PNFG and PG three times a week for 4 weeks. The elderly women in the CG received no intervention and continued with their daily activities. Stabilometric parameters, the Berg Balance Scale score, functional reach test, and timed up and go test (TUG test) were assessed before and 1 month after participation.

Results

In the comparison among groups, the women in the PNFG showed a significant reduction in most of the stabilometric parameters evaluated and better Berg Balance Scale score, functional reach test result, and TUG test result than did women in the CG (p < 0.05). Women in the PG showed significantly better performance on the functional reach test and TUG test than did women in the CG (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Women in the PNFG showed significantly better static and dynamic balance than did women in the CG. Women in the PG also showed better dynamic balance than did women in the CG. However, no significant differences were observed in any of the balance variables assessed between the PNFG and PG.

Posted in: August main topic - balance
« Previous
Next »

About


View all posts by morw31

  • membership
  • contact
  • links
  • Main theme of previous months
  • Home
  • Active I
  • congresses
  • contact
  • EGREPA
  • membership
  • publications
  • Research Centers
  • Societies
  • Whole
  • young researchers
we will be happy to hear from you
All rights reserved to EGREPA©
Scroll to top
Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • High ContrastHigh Contrast
  • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
  • Light BackgroundLight Background
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset